Clare Ryan v University of Ulster Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceNIIT 339/14
Legal BodyNorthern Ireland Industrial Tribunal (NIIT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionWhistleblowing (Protected Disclosures)
The claimant’s claim was that she was subjected to detriment in an internal selection process on grounds of having made a protected disclosure. It was accepted by the respondent that the claimant had made a protected disclosure and the focus was on whether or not the claimant suffered detriment on grounds of having made that protected disclosure.
It was contended that the reason she was not short-listed was because a Professor from the selection panel deliberately wanted to make sure that she would not get the post firstly, because she was a whistleblower and, secondly, because they wanted to make sure that the claimant would have no contact with DEL in relation to the previous financial
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.