Hounga v Allen and another  UKSC 47Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceUKSC 47
Legal BodyUk Supreme Court (UKSC)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionDiscrimination and Equality
The claimant is a Nigerian national and was an au pair in a private household. She alleged discriminatory dismissal and race discrimination short of dismissal during her 18 months' employment. However, she was not allowed to work in the UK and she was aware of that fact. Her contract was tainted with illegality to such an extent that the Court of Appeal found it to be fatal to her right to pursue her employment claims - it was knowingly illegal in its inception. In the lead judgement from May 2012, Rimer LJ commented, "...for a tribunal to accede to her discrimination claim would be to condone her own illegality, since that illegality formed a material part of her dismissal discrimination
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.