Usdaw v Ethel Austin Ltd (in administration)  UKEAT/0547/12/KN & UKEAT/0548/12/KNPosted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceUKEAT/0547/12/KN & UKEAT/0548/12/KN
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionRedundancy and Reorganisation
In these combined appeals the EAT found that section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 failed to correctly implement the EU Collective Redundancies Directive (No.98/59).
The cases concerned the wording of section 188(1) of the 1992 Act, which reads: “188(1) Where an employer is proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, the employer shall consult about the dismissals all the persons who are appropriate representatives of any of the employees who may be affected by the proposed dismissals or may be affected by measures taken in connection with those dismissals.”
If an employer fails to
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.