CD v ST  AG's Opinion CJEU Case C 167/12
Case ReferenceC 167/12
Legal BodyCourt of Justice EU (CJEU/ECJ)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionWorking Time and Leave
This case is very similar in facts to Z v A Government Department and the Board of Management of a Community School  AG's Opinion CJEU Case C 363/12. Notably the AG in this case adopted a completely different approach in their interpretation of the applicability of Directive 92/85 than AG Wahl. This case concerned the entitlement to maternity pay of a woman who had commissioned surrogacy. In her case this was not a genetic surrogacy arrangement, but the fact that the baby would not be genetically her offspring made no difference to the fundamental merits of the case.
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from Maxine Orr, Partner at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.