Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham and Ors  UKEAT 0534_12_0102Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceUKEAT 0534_12_0102
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
In support of a discrimination claim the claimant sought permission to adduce in evidence 39 hours’ worth of covert recordings which she had made of conversations between herself and her managers or colleagues. The application was refused. On appeal, it was held that the Judge had been plainly right to refuse the application as made, since neither the recordings themselves nor any transcripts had been made available. However, it was open to the claimant to make a more focused application, properly supported by transcripts of the material sought to be relied on.
It was held that covert recordings, of themselves, are not inadmissible, no matter how wrong they might seem to some: “the practice
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.