Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron and ors  CJEU Case C-426/11 AG OpinionPosted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceCJEU Case C-426/11
Legal BodyCourt of Justice EU (CJEU/ECJ)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTransfer of Undertaking (TUPE)
The appellant employees (A) appealed against a decision that their entitlement to pay increases negotiated by collective agreement was not protected under the Transfer of Undertaking (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (TUPE) reg.5 post-transfer of their employment to the respondent employer (B). A had been entitled under their contracts of employment with a local authority to pay increases in accordance with collective agreements negotiated by the National Joint Council for Local Government Services (NJC). Their contracts were transferred under the Regulations to a privatesector employer and then further transferred to P, also a private-sector employer.
P refused to recognise a pay
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.