Boomer v NIPSA & Others  NIFET 57/11 FETPosted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceNIFET 57/11 FET
Type of Claim / JurisdictionTribunal Procedures and Jurisdictional Issues
The Fair Employment Tribunal has awarded £4,500 costs against a NIPSA full-time official following his misconceived claims of political discrimination against the union and other officials. The Tribunal found Mr Boomer at fault for much of the length of the hearing and felt he conducted himself unreasonably. He had also been warned that the respondents would seek costs. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 35(3) of the Rules of Procedure, it was then necessary for the Tribunal to consider, as part of the said two-stage process, whether to exercise its discretion and to make an Order for Costs.
The Tribunal decided that it was an appropriate exercise of its discretion to make such an Order for Costs
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.