Anderson & Ors v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority  EWCA Civ 321Posted In: Case Law
Case ReferenceEWCA Civ 321
Legal BodyEngland and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA)
Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
The appellant employees (A) appealed against a decision that a collective pay agreement with the respondent employer (B) gave B the opportunity to choose from two different pay increases. B had reached an agreement with A's trade union. This agreement was included in A’s employment contracts and made provision for set pay increases for 2007 and 2008. For 2009 the agreement stated that pay would be increased by 2.5 per cent or by the NJC Local Government Services settlement plus 1 per cent. In 2009 B claimed it was not obligated to increase pay by 2.5 per cent. A brought proceedings for unlawful deductions from wages.
It was held by the employment tribunal that B was not contractually
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.