The Manchester College v Hazel and Huggins [2012]

Posted In: Case Law
  • Case Reference
    UKEAT/0642/11/RN
  • Legal Body
    Employment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
  • Type of Claim / Jurisdiction
    Transfer of Undertaking (TUPE)
Issues covered: TUPE; Harmonisation; Reengagement

The claimants‟ employment was transferred to the respondent under TUPE, who then sought cost savings through voluntary redundancies and pay cuts. The claimants were assured that their jobs were safe and were offered new employment contracts on reduced pay which they refused to sign. The claimants were then dismissed. They subsequently agreed to these new contracts and continued in employment. However they sued for unfair dismissal. The Employment Tribunal found that the reason for the dismissals was not to effect changes to the workforce; rather they were for economic, technical or organisational reasons and were connected with the

Already a subscriber?

Click here to login and access the full article.

Don't miss out, register today!

Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.

Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe

24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues

Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law

Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors

Already a subscriber, now or Register

This article is correct at 07/09/2012
Disclaimer:

The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.