O’Brien v Ministry of Justice  CJEUPosted In: Case Law
Legal BodyCourt of Justice EU (CJEU/ECJ)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionPensions, A-Typical Working
The claimant, Mr O'Brien, was called to the Bar in 1962 and appointed Queen's Counsel in 1983. He worked as a Recorder from 1978 until his retirement in 2005, on his 65th birthday. It was then that he requested, relying on Directive 97/81 and the Part-Time Workers 22 Regulations, a retirement pension calculated as a proportion on a pro rata basis of that which a full-time Circuit Judge would be entitled to if he had retired on the same date. The Department of Constitutional Affairs rejected his request, considering that Mr O'Brien had no claim to a pension. The Supreme Court referred the following questions to the Court of Justice:
- Is it for national law to determine whether or not judges
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
More on Pensions
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.