Chivas Brothers v Robertson Posted In: Case Law
Legal BodyEmployment Appeal Tribunal (UKEAT)
Type of Claim / JurisdictionUnfair Dismissal
The employee, in this case, was dismissed after spending nearly £100,000 on her company credit card over a ten month period, taking her spending well over the £5,000 per month limit. The employer argued that in doing so she had negligently caused significant financial damage to the company. She had not kept any records of the consumables she ordered, nor could she explain her authority for the excess expenditure, which was not supported by business usage. The items purchased had never been received into stock.
The Employment Tribunal found her dismissal to have been automatically unfair as step 2 of the statutory dismissal procedure had not been complied with. There were also procedural
Already a subscriber?
Click here to login and access the full article.Log in now to read the full article
Don't miss out, start your free trial today!
Are you fully aware of the benefits of Legal-Island's Employment Law Update Service? We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact on your business.
Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
Ensure your organisation’s policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team at Worthingtons Solicitors
Recent Case Law
- BC v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland 
- Duley v NHS Sheffield Clinical Commissioning Group 
- Chalimoniuk v Transkol Limited and FN Transport Limited 
- Heskett v Secretary of State for Justice 
- R (On the Application of the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Anor 
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal-Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.